|
Observations on Gnosticism and Manicheism
(extract)
Howard F. Vos
Gnosticism seems to have existed in germ form in the days of
Paul and John. For instance, Colossians 2:8, 18-19 and much of
1 John may well have been aimed at this error. Gnosticism was a
product of the spirit of religious fusion that characterized the
first century. It borrowed elements from Judaism, Christianity,
Greek philosophy, and Oriental mysticism and constructed a
system of thought that sought to combine revelation with the
"wisdom of this world". Spawned primarily in Egypt and Syria,
it spread to Rome, Asia Minor, Mesopotamia, and Persia.
Gnostics taught that matter was evil and spirit was good. ...
Gnosticism derived its name from a Greek word for knowledge
(gnosis), and emphasis in the system was put on attaining
knowledge of the good God which would ensure salvation.
The system was extremely aristocratic. It taught that the true
Gnostics, of whom there were few, were born with a high degree
of intuitive knowledge of God. Christ's teachings would help
them to overcome the material world and enable them to establish
communication with God and gain entrance into the kingdom of
light. Ordinary church members could attain salvation by faith
and good works. But the mass of humanity did not have a chance
to be saved. Of great value to the true Gnostic and the average
church member in attaining an experience of God was initiation into
the mysteries of marriage to Christ, baptism, and other mystical rites
of the church. The path of redemption also involved a low estimate
of the flesh. Some punished the body by extreme asceticism;
others gave full rein to the carnal desires of the flesh, for they felt
that in such a manner the flesh could best be destroyed. ...
Gnosticism as a system was fairly short-lived, partly because of
its inherent weaknesses and partly because the polemicists
(especially Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Hippolytus) were effective
in dealing with it. It left lasting effects on the church,
however, negatively in asceticism and the division of Christians
into higher and lower orders (clergy and laity) and positively
in forcing the church to a clearer definition of her doctrine
and the limits of her canon. ...
Some of its teachings survived in Manicheism; and a Gnostic or Manichean
type sect, the Mandaeans, still exists in Mesopotamia south
of Baghdad. ...
Until the end of World War II, students of Gnosticism were
almost entirely dependent for their information on references in
the opponents of Gnosticism. Then in 1945, as a camel driver
was doing some digging at Nag Hammadi in upper Egypt, he found a
jar containing the remains of thirteen codexes from the fourth
century A. D. These contained Coptic versions of some fifty
writings, most of which were Gnostic texts. ...
Manicheism has been described as Gnosticism with its Christian
elements reduced to a minimum and Oriental elements raised to a
maximum. The system was developed by Mani in Southern Babylonia
about 240 and thereafter rapidly spread through Persia, India,
China, Egypt, North Africa, and Italy. ... In this system
there were two classes: elect and auditors. Only the
former were admitted to the secret rites of baptism and communion,
which were celebrated with great pomp. The elect were very
ascetic and occupied themselves with religious exercises. The
auditors participated in the holiness of the elect in return for
supplying the elect with the necessities of life. Manicheism
helped to foster the ascetic spirit in the churches and was in
large measure responsible for the division of church members
into clergy and laity. Moreover, it promoted the growth of the
priestly function, or the belief that ministers are intermediaries
between God and humanity and have extraordinary power from God.
From Exploring Church History, pages 32 and 34.
Howard F. Vos is the Professor of History and Archaeology Emeritus
at The King's College in New York City. He has authored, among
other works, Exploring Church History. He holds doctorates
from Dallas Theological Seminary and Northwestern University.
Observations on Gnosticism and Manicheism
|